I predicted that ladies that have a somewhat down companion value than just their companion carry out statement large sexiness away from underclothes across the all three contexts.
Prediction 3a.
For context one, a linear regression indicated a main effect of intent for sexual activity on sexiness of underclothes (t = -6.32; p < .001) and a main effect of MVD on sexiness of underclothes (t = 3.59; p < .001); however, we found no interaction effect between intent and MVD on sexiness of underclothes. In contrast to prediction 3a, the directionality of the MVD t-value indicates that women who have similar or higher relative mate value to their partners reported wearing sexier underwear.
Forecast 3b.
63; p < .001). Additionally, we found no interaction effect between initiation and MVD on sexiness of underclothes. Again, the t-value direction shows no support for prediction 3b: women who have similar or higher relative mate value to their partners reported wearing sexier underclothes.
Prediction 3c.
Having framework around three, a linear regression research showed zero aftereffect of MVD towards sexiness out of underclothes during a fantastic sexual come upon. Anticipate 3c wasn’t supported.
Exploratory study out-of MVD
To better understand the role of mate value with intimate apparel, we performed an exploratory analysis on independent self and partner mate values in relation to intimate apparel during the most recent sexual encounter, relationship commitment, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated that partner mate value (B = .45, SE = .13, p = .001); self mate value (B = .86, SE = .12, p < .001); commitment (B = .54, SE = .21, p = .01); and relationship satisfaction (B = .36, SE = .11, p < .001) were all independent, significant predictors for sexiness of underclothes. However, when controlling for partner mate value, commitment, and relationship satisfaction, self mate value was the only predictor for sexiness of underclothes (B = .87, SE = .14, p < .001), indicating a full mediating effect of self mate value on intimate apparel use in context two. All these results show that a woman's own mate value predicts her use of intimate apparel during her most recent sexual encounter despite her partner's mate value, her commitment to the relationship, and her relationship satisfaction.
After that study shown equivalent outcomes for both contexts one to and you may about three, showing that a good woman’s perceived mate well worth establishes the girl entry to intimate apparel outside the perspective off the woman most recent partnership. That being said, an analysis regarding relationship connection suggests that ladies who much more dedicated to the relationships while having a negative MVD (her mate value is lower than the lover’s) involved with alot more the means to access horny underclothes throughout their newest sexual stumble on (B = -.thirty-five, SE = meetmindful .sixteen, p = .03) however throughout contexts one to or three.
Talk
The reason for this research was to identify ladies usage of intimate apparel given that a subtle intimate laws out-of proceptivity and receptivity in heterosexual romantic relationships; not, the conclusions recommend underwear might serve various other purpose toward feamales in this research. I predicted that women dons sexier undies once they questioned to be intimately energetic whenever introducing sexual activity. Feamales in this research performed in fact statement wear sexier underwear whenever likely to become intimately effective later that go out, but ladies’ entry to underwear failed to rather join sexual initiation. I also forecast that when a female’s imagined spouse worth is relatively below this lady lover’s, she’d become more planning play with underwear in order to laws their proceptivity and you can receptivity. In contrast, i learned that whenever good female’s cousin companion well worth is actually similar so you’re able to or more than just–yet not below–the lady partner’s spouse really worth, she advertised wearing hotter undergarments around the all the three contexts.